Petitieonline.com

Raportați o petiție

Takeshi Koizumi

Petițiile exprimă opinii. A nu fi de acord cu o petiție sau a considera că este inutilă nu reprezintă un motiv de raportare, iar astfel de rapoarte sunt închise automat. Raportați o petiție numai dacă încalcă legea sau Regulile noastre comunitare, de exemplu discurs instigator la ură, defăimarea unei persoane sau organizații, publicarea de informații private ori fraudă. Noi nu verificăm dacă afirmațiile dintr-o petiție sunt adevărate, autorul este responsabil pentru ele.

Acest raport ajunge la persoanele care administrează acest site, nu la autorul petiției și nici la vreo autoritate. Dacă aveți o întrebare sau un feedback pentru autor, trimiteți-i un mesaj.

Puteți redacta raportul dumneavoastră în engleză? Astfel îl putem prelucra mai repede, deoarece nu mai trebuie să comandăm o traducere.
De ce raportați acest lucru?
Ce este în neregulă cu numele?
Vă rugăm să ne spuneți în câmpul de text de mai jos ce vă face să credeți acest lucru.

Petițiile exprimă opinii. A nu fi de acord cu o petiție sau a considera că este inutilă nu reprezintă un motiv de raportare, iar noi nu eliminăm petițiile doar pentru că oamenii se opun acestora.

Dacă trimiteți acest formular, dezacordul dumneavoastră este înregistrat, iar raportul este închis automat fără nicio acțiune; decizia este trimisă la adresa dumneavoastră de e-mail. Dacă conținutul încalcă legea sau Regulile noastre comunitare, alegeți în schimb opțiunea de mai sus.

Puteți, de asemenea, să începeți propria petiție sau să contactați autorul.

Afirmația falsă vă privește pe dumneavoastră, organizația dumneavoastră sau o altă persoană ori organizație identificabilă?

Care pasaj este fals? Puteți face clic pe mai multe propoziții din textul petiției și ne puteți spune pentru fiecare ce este adevărat. Acest lucru este opțional.

Propozițiile alăturate sunt grupate într-o singură afirmație. Dați clic din nou pe o propoziție pentru a o elimina.

Takeshi Koizumi

To The President of The House of Councilors of Japan

To The Speaker of The House of Representatives of JapanTo

The Minister of The Environment Ministry of Japan

Your Honor,

We are a group of animal lovers and activists from Romania. Please don’t think of our approach as foreign interference in the internal affairs of Japan. In this letter we refer to the Japanese policy that allows thousands of dogs and cats to be murdered every year. We refer here to animals as international living beings and not necessarily nationals of a certain country. The ruthless killing of dogs takes place in other countries of the world as well, but our attention was drawn to the particularly cruel situation in Japan by a book published in Romania about the life story of Takeshi Koizumi. Mr. Koizumi’s dog, Chiro, was abducted by the dog catchers and killed in a Public Health Protection Center – Hokenjo – while Mr. Koizumi was only a child, back in 1974. Chiro was wearing a dog collar and the family went to take him back from the Center the day he was caught, but they were told that Chiro had been moved to a Center in another city and, as it was a Friday, the Center would be closed until Monday. When Mr. Koizumi’s father went on Monday to the Center in Iwakuni, Yamaguchi Prefecture, they told him that Chiro had already been put to death! The child suffered immensely and, from that day on, he decided to take revenge for his best friend. The boy became an adult and his decision grew even stronger. In 2008 he intended to kill several former administrative vice-ministers of the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry, but he managed to kill only one of them, Mr. Yamaguchi, together with his wife. Mr. Koizumi is now in jail, sentenced to death by the Tokyo High Court of Justice. It goes without saying that we intend to ask for him to be granted a pardon if the Supreme Court of Justice also sentences him to death. This is because we very much take into account his trauma at having lost his dog. We can understand his anger with the system that makes possible such brutal acts, which continue to this day, and are taking a heavy toll among dogs and cats. We are foreigners and our knowledge of Japan is not perfect, but as far as we understand the local legislation, your country has its own regulation in this respect, the Law of Love and Protection of the Animals – Dobutsu Aigoho. It includes very nice provisions, and according to chapter 6 article 44, punishments are provided for those who kill or mistreat animals “aimlessly”, midari ni. The Japanese state and local administrations make an arbitrary interpretation of midari ni and maybe also according to further Japanese government ordinances, in the so-called Hokenjo, they proceed to the cruel execution of cats and dogs with no owner or who are lost. The policy of the Health Protection Centers is established by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the very reason why Mr. Koizumi decided to kill its top administrators. We therefore kindly ask you to revise the Japanese law by showing mercy to our companion and to all former companion animals imprisoned in these extermination facilities called Public Health Centers and Animal Protection Centers across your country. These companion animals are living beings and have a dignity of their own. Japan is the world’s third largest economy and can afford to keep all unwanted or lost animals in decent shelters until they are adopted by a family or even until their natural demise. In our opinion, the shelters should not fall under the supervision of Health Protection Centers, linked to the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare because the temptation to channel them towards scientific experiments would be too strong. We know this is already frequently the case in Japan, and that animals undergo tremendous suffering and painful deaths. Furthermore, the Health Protection Centers are notorious for animal abuse. We were horrified to find out that animals are not even killed through euthanasia, but, in most cases, in gas chambers, the survivors being thrown together with those already dead and set on fire still alive! All this has to stop, yet most of the Japanese public seem unaware of the fate of their pets. Meanwhile, initiatives such as the letter concerning the revision of Japanese law regarding animals, sent to Your Honor by Animals Network Japan, are being disregarded altogether. Even Romania, a country not as rich as Japan, has enforced, since 2008, a law that forbids the killing and mistreatment of dogs and cats, with a 3.5 year prison sentence for those who break it. The senator who drafted the law at that time, Mr. Marius Marinescu, is among the signatories of this letter. Of course, Romania is not an economical power, but rather a country facing economic difficulties. Consequently, not all animal shelters are in good condition here. The law is still relatively new and police resources are stretched, so there are cases when dogs face cruelty from their owners who still go unpunished. Therefore, Romania is not to be taken as an example. What we would recommend is looking at Germany as an example for companion animals legislation and treatment. So, please, your Honor, whatever you do, think about the pointlessness of cruelty, especially to animals, creatures that are weak and need protection and love, and about making Japan look like a sympathetic country with regard to the above mentioned issue.

Respectfully,

Noi nu verificăm dacă afirmațiile dintr-o petiție sunt adevărate, autorul este responsabil pentru ele. Dacă trimiteți acest formular, acesta este înregistrat, iar raportul este închis automat fără nicio acțiune; decizia este trimisă la adresa dumneavoastră de e-mail.

Puteți să începeți propria petiție cu informațiile pe care le considerați corecte sau să contactați autorul.

O afirmație falsă despre o persoană sau o organizație identificabilă reprezintă defăimare, iar noi acționăm în astfel de cazuri.

Continuați: raportați defăimarea

Despre cine este conținutul?
Persoana despre care este conținutul este un politician, un factor de decizie sau o altă persoană publică?
Ce critică conținutul?

Critica publică la adresa modului în care un politician sau un factor de decizie acționează în calitate publică este permisă, inclusiv atunci când evenimentele sunt vechi. Faptul că o situație este veche nu reprezintă, în sine, un motiv pentru eliminare. Putem totuși să acționăm în cazul unei afirmații false despre persoană sau al unui conținut altfel ilegal.

Dacă situația este veche sau nu mai este de actualitate, cel mai bine este să contactați direct autorul petiției. Autorul poate elimina petiția din orice motiv; noi nu putem.

Persoana despre care este conținutul este un politician, un factor de decizie sau o altă persoană publică?
Ce critică conținutul?

Critica publică la adresa modului în care un politician sau un factor de decizie acționează în calitate publică este permisă, inclusiv atunci când evenimentele sunt vechi. Faptul că o situație este veche nu reprezintă, în sine, un motiv pentru eliminare. Putem totuși să acționăm în cazul unei afirmații false despre persoană sau al unui conținut altfel ilegal.

Dacă situația este veche sau nu mai este de actualitate, cel mai bine este să contactați direct autorul petiției. Autorul poate elimina petiția din orice motiv; noi nu putem.

Noi nu verificăm dacă afirmațiile dintr-o petiție sunt adevărate, autorul este responsabil pentru ele. Acționăm în cazul unei afirmații false atunci când aceasta privește o persoană sau o organizație identificabilă. Dacă pur și simplu nu sunteți de acord cu afirmația, puteți începe propria petiție sau puteți contacta autorul.

Dați clic pe propozițiile false din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact reprezintă discurs instigator la ură? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact face apel la violență? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact glorifică sau instigă la terorism? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact hărțuiește sau intimidează pe cineva? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact divulgă informații private? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact acuză pe cineva de o infracțiune? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact face apel la pedeapsa cu moartea sau la tortură? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Propozițiile alăturate sunt grupate într-o singură afirmație. Dați clic din nou pe o propoziție pentru a o elimina.

Takeshi Koizumi

To The President of The House of Councilors of Japan

To The Speaker of The House of Representatives of JapanTo

The Minister of The Environment Ministry of Japan

Your Honor,

We are a group of animal lovers and activists from Romania. Please don’t think of our approach as foreign interference in the internal affairs of Japan. In this letter we refer to the Japanese policy that allows thousands of dogs and cats to be murdered every year. We refer here to animals as international living beings and not necessarily nationals of a certain country. The ruthless killing of dogs takes place in other countries of the world as well, but our attention was drawn to the particularly cruel situation in Japan by a book published in Romania about the life story of Takeshi Koizumi. Mr. Koizumi’s dog, Chiro, was abducted by the dog catchers and killed in a Public Health Protection Center – Hokenjo – while Mr. Koizumi was only a child, back in 1974. Chiro was wearing a dog collar and the family went to take him back from the Center the day he was caught, but they were told that Chiro had been moved to a Center in another city and, as it was a Friday, the Center would be closed until Monday. When Mr. Koizumi’s father went on Monday to the Center in Iwakuni, Yamaguchi Prefecture, they told him that Chiro had already been put to death! The child suffered immensely and, from that day on, he decided to take revenge for his best friend. The boy became an adult and his decision grew even stronger. In 2008 he intended to kill several former administrative vice-ministers of the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry, but he managed to kill only one of them, Mr. Yamaguchi, together with his wife. Mr. Koizumi is now in jail, sentenced to death by the Tokyo High Court of Justice. It goes without saying that we intend to ask for him to be granted a pardon if the Supreme Court of Justice also sentences him to death. This is because we very much take into account his trauma at having lost his dog. We can understand his anger with the system that makes possible such brutal acts, which continue to this day, and are taking a heavy toll among dogs and cats. We are foreigners and our knowledge of Japan is not perfect, but as far as we understand the local legislation, your country has its own regulation in this respect, the Law of Love and Protection of the Animals – Dobutsu Aigoho. It includes very nice provisions, and according to chapter 6 article 44, punishments are provided for those who kill or mistreat animals “aimlessly”, midari ni. The Japanese state and local administrations make an arbitrary interpretation of midari ni and maybe also according to further Japanese government ordinances, in the so-called Hokenjo, they proceed to the cruel execution of cats and dogs with no owner or who are lost. The policy of the Health Protection Centers is established by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the very reason why Mr. Koizumi decided to kill its top administrators. We therefore kindly ask you to revise the Japanese law by showing mercy to our companion and to all former companion animals imprisoned in these extermination facilities called Public Health Centers and Animal Protection Centers across your country. These companion animals are living beings and have a dignity of their own. Japan is the world’s third largest economy and can afford to keep all unwanted or lost animals in decent shelters until they are adopted by a family or even until their natural demise. In our opinion, the shelters should not fall under the supervision of Health Protection Centers, linked to the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare because the temptation to channel them towards scientific experiments would be too strong. We know this is already frequently the case in Japan, and that animals undergo tremendous suffering and painful deaths. Furthermore, the Health Protection Centers are notorious for animal abuse. We were horrified to find out that animals are not even killed through euthanasia, but, in most cases, in gas chambers, the survivors being thrown together with those already dead and set on fire still alive! All this has to stop, yet most of the Japanese public seem unaware of the fate of their pets. Meanwhile, initiatives such as the letter concerning the revision of Japanese law regarding animals, sent to Your Honor by Animals Network Japan, are being disregarded altogether. Even Romania, a country not as rich as Japan, has enforced, since 2008, a law that forbids the killing and mistreatment of dogs and cats, with a 3.5 year prison sentence for those who break it. The senator who drafted the law at that time, Mr. Marius Marinescu, is among the signatories of this letter. Of course, Romania is not an economical power, but rather a country facing economic difficulties. Consequently, not all animal shelters are in good condition here. The law is still relatively new and police resources are stretched, so there are cases when dogs face cruelty from their owners who still go unpunished. Therefore, Romania is not to be taken as an example. What we would recommend is looking at Germany as an example for companion animals legislation and treatment. So, please, your Honor, whatever you do, think about the pointlessness of cruelty, especially to animals, creatures that are weak and need protection and love, and about making Japan look like a sympathetic country with regard to the above mentioned issue.

Respectfully,

Dați clic pe propozițiile false din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact reprezintă discurs instigator la ură? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact divulgă informații private? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Care pasaj exact reprezintă conținut terorist sau extremist? Dați clic pe propozițiile din textul petiției.

Propozițiile alăturate sunt grupate într-o singură afirmație. Dați clic din nou pe o propoziție pentru a o elimina.

Takeshi Koizumi

To The President of The House of Councilors of Japan

To The Speaker of The House of Representatives of JapanTo

The Minister of The Environment Ministry of Japan

Your Honor,

We are a group of animal lovers and activists from Romania. Please don’t think of our approach as foreign interference in the internal affairs of Japan. In this letter we refer to the Japanese policy that allows thousands of dogs and cats to be murdered every year. We refer here to animals as international living beings and not necessarily nationals of a certain country. The ruthless killing of dogs takes place in other countries of the world as well, but our attention was drawn to the particularly cruel situation in Japan by a book published in Romania about the life story of Takeshi Koizumi. Mr. Koizumi’s dog, Chiro, was abducted by the dog catchers and killed in a Public Health Protection Center – Hokenjo – while Mr. Koizumi was only a child, back in 1974. Chiro was wearing a dog collar and the family went to take him back from the Center the day he was caught, but they were told that Chiro had been moved to a Center in another city and, as it was a Friday, the Center would be closed until Monday. When Mr. Koizumi’s father went on Monday to the Center in Iwakuni, Yamaguchi Prefecture, they told him that Chiro had already been put to death! The child suffered immensely and, from that day on, he decided to take revenge for his best friend. The boy became an adult and his decision grew even stronger. In 2008 he intended to kill several former administrative vice-ministers of the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry, but he managed to kill only one of them, Mr. Yamaguchi, together with his wife. Mr. Koizumi is now in jail, sentenced to death by the Tokyo High Court of Justice. It goes without saying that we intend to ask for him to be granted a pardon if the Supreme Court of Justice also sentences him to death. This is because we very much take into account his trauma at having lost his dog. We can understand his anger with the system that makes possible such brutal acts, which continue to this day, and are taking a heavy toll among dogs and cats. We are foreigners and our knowledge of Japan is not perfect, but as far as we understand the local legislation, your country has its own regulation in this respect, the Law of Love and Protection of the Animals – Dobutsu Aigoho. It includes very nice provisions, and according to chapter 6 article 44, punishments are provided for those who kill or mistreat animals “aimlessly”, midari ni. The Japanese state and local administrations make an arbitrary interpretation of midari ni and maybe also according to further Japanese government ordinances, in the so-called Hokenjo, they proceed to the cruel execution of cats and dogs with no owner or who are lost. The policy of the Health Protection Centers is established by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the very reason why Mr. Koizumi decided to kill its top administrators. We therefore kindly ask you to revise the Japanese law by showing mercy to our companion and to all former companion animals imprisoned in these extermination facilities called Public Health Centers and Animal Protection Centers across your country. These companion animals are living beings and have a dignity of their own. Japan is the world’s third largest economy and can afford to keep all unwanted or lost animals in decent shelters until they are adopted by a family or even until their natural demise. In our opinion, the shelters should not fall under the supervision of Health Protection Centers, linked to the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare because the temptation to channel them towards scientific experiments would be too strong. We know this is already frequently the case in Japan, and that animals undergo tremendous suffering and painful deaths. Furthermore, the Health Protection Centers are notorious for animal abuse. We were horrified to find out that animals are not even killed through euthanasia, but, in most cases, in gas chambers, the survivors being thrown together with those already dead and set on fire still alive! All this has to stop, yet most of the Japanese public seem unaware of the fate of their pets. Meanwhile, initiatives such as the letter concerning the revision of Japanese law regarding animals, sent to Your Honor by Animals Network Japan, are being disregarded altogether. Even Romania, a country not as rich as Japan, has enforced, since 2008, a law that forbids the killing and mistreatment of dogs and cats, with a 3.5 year prison sentence for those who break it. The senator who drafted the law at that time, Mr. Marius Marinescu, is among the signatories of this letter. Of course, Romania is not an economical power, but rather a country facing economic difficulties. Consequently, not all animal shelters are in good condition here. The law is still relatively new and police resources are stretched, so there are cases when dogs face cruelty from their owners who still go unpunished. Therefore, Romania is not to be taken as an example. What we would recommend is looking at Germany as an example for companion animals legislation and treatment. So, please, your Honor, whatever you do, think about the pointlessness of cruelty, especially to animals, creatures that are weak and need protection and love, and about making Japan look like a sympathetic country with regard to the above mentioned issue.

Respectfully,

Folosim acest lucru pentru a confirma primirea raportului dvs. și pentru a vă comunica rezultatul.
Raportez
Ce solicitați? Puteți alege mai multe opțiuni.
Ne permiteți să transmitem solicitarea dumneavoastră autorului petiției? Autorul poate elimina petiția din orice motiv și poate răspunde la solicitare mai repede decât moderatorii noștri.
Ne permiteți să transmitem solicitarea dumneavoastră autorului petiției? Autorul poate elimina petiția din orice motiv și poate răspunde la solicitare mai repede decât moderatorii noștri.
Ne permiteți să transmitem solicitarea dumneavoastră autorului petiției? Autorul poate elimina petiția din orice motiv și poate răspunde la solicitare mai repede decât moderatorii noștri.

Petițiile semnalate sunt analizate de echipa noastră pentru a stabili dacă încalcă Termenii și condițiile noastre sau Regulile comunității noastre.